Contents

Does whistleblowing always compromise bureaucratic reputation? Exploring the role of accountability institutions through bureaucratic reputation theory

KANG, Minsung Michael / Lee, Danbee / Park, Nara

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKANG, Minsung Michael-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Danbee-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Nara-
dc.date.available2024-03-29T06:50:01Z-
dc.date.created2024-03-29-
dc.date.issued2024-03-
dc.identifier.issn1471-9037-
dc.identifier.urihttps://archives.kdischool.ac.kr/handle/11125/54096-
dc.identifier.uri10.1080/14719037.2024.2327631-
dc.description.abstractOrganizational reputation is subject to losses when whistleblowing occurs. Based on ethics management and bureaucratic reputation theories, we examined whether the loss could vary depending on whistleblowing channels, such as official channels of accountability institutions (U.S. Office of Special Counsel and Office of Inspector General), and unofficial channels (media) and the existence of whistleblowing management from official channels. From survey experiments with U.S. citizens, we found reputational loss may occur after whistleblowing, but it could be mitigated when managed properly through accountability institutions. Our findings suggest the importance of governments showing efforts to resolve moral issues from citizens’ views.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis-
dc.titleDoes whistleblowing always compromise bureaucratic reputation? Exploring the role of accountability institutions through bureaucratic reputation theory-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationPublic Management Review, pp. 1-27-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.identifier.wosid001183134700001-
dc.citation.endPage27-
dc.citation.startPage1-
dc.citation.titlePublic Management Review-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKANG, Minsung Michael-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/14719037.2024.2327631-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14719037.2024.2327631?src=-
dc.type.docTypeArticle; Early Access-
dc.subject.keywordPlusORGANIZATIONAL REPUTATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusTRANSPARENCY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMANAGEMENT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCORRUPTION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusATTITUDES-
dc.subject.keywordPlusAGENCIES-
dc.subject.keywordPlusTRUST-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMODEL-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorBureaucratic Reputation-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorWhistleblowing-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorEthics Management-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorSurvey Experiment-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorU.S. Federal Government-
Files in This Item:
    There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in Collections:

Click the button and follow the links to connect to the full text. (KDI CL members only)

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

상단으로 이동