Does whistleblowing always compromise bureaucratic reputation? Exploring the role of accountability institutions through bureaucratic reputation theory
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | KANG, Minsung Michael | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Danbee | - |
dc.contributor.author | Park, Nara | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-29T06:50:01Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2024-03-29 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024-03 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1471-9037 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://archives.kdischool.ac.kr/handle/11125/54096 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | 10.1080/14719037.2024.2327631 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Organizational reputation is subject to losses when whistleblowing occurs. Based on ethics management and bureaucratic reputation theories, we examined whether the loss could vary depending on whistleblowing channels, such as official channels of accountability institutions (U.S. Office of Special Counsel and Office of Inspector General), and unofficial channels (media) and the existence of whistleblowing management from official channels. From survey experiments with U.S. citizens, we found reputational loss may occur after whistleblowing, but it could be mitigated when managed properly through accountability institutions. Our findings suggest the importance of governments showing efforts to resolve moral issues from citizens’ views. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | - |
dc.title | Does whistleblowing always compromise bureaucratic reputation? Exploring the role of accountability institutions through bureaucratic reputation theory | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Public Management Review, pp. 1-27 | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 001183134700001 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 27 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 1 | - |
dc.citation.title | Public Management Review | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | KANG, Minsung Michael | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/14719037.2024.2327631 | - |
dc.identifier.url | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14719037.2024.2327631?src= | - |
dc.type.docType | Article; Early Access | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | ORGANIZATIONAL REPUTATION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | TRANSPARENCY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | MANAGEMENT | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | CORRUPTION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | ATTITUDES | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | AGENCIES | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | TRUST | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | MODEL | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Bureaucratic Reputation | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Whistleblowing | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Ethics Management | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Survey Experiment | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | U.S. Federal Government | - |
Click the button and follow the links to connect to the full text. (KDI CL members only)
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.