Whistleblowing in the Public Sector: A Systematic Literature Review

KANG, Minsung Michael

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKANG, Minsung Michael-
dc.description.abstractPublic administration scholars have provided a variety of theoretical insights to understand bureaucratic whistleblowing, and have emphasized its ethical, legal, and practical rationales in the context of democratic bureaucracy. To enhance our understanding of this principled dissent behavior in the public sector, this study systematically reviews 71 whistleblowing articles and dissertations that address three aspects in the literature: (1) definitions and theories; (2) methods and data, and (3) factors associated with whistleblowing intention and behavior. The findings show public administration whistleblowing research typically uses Near and Miceli’s definition, grounded on psychology, ethics, and human resource management (HRM) theories. Methodologically, there is a notable recent trend in the growth of empirical research using survey data, and equal attention has been paid to both whistleblowing intention and behavior variables. Based on the review findings, the study discusses two issues—definitional and theoretical—and presents four research agendas for future bureaucratic whistleblowing scholarship.-
dc.publisherSage Publications-
dc.titleWhistleblowing in the Public Sector: A Systematic Literature Review-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationReview of Public Personnel Administration-
dc.citation.titleReview of Public Personnel Administration-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKANG, Minsung Michael-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorWhistleblower Protection-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorSystematic Literature Review-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorMerit Principles-
Files in This Item:
    There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in Collections:

Click the button and follow the links to connect to the full text. (KDI CL members only)


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

상단으로 이동