주요국 무역 분야 원조의 정책체계 한국의 정책방향

한홍렬 / 이호생 / 이시욱(Author)

  • 1168 ITEM VIEW

Aid for trade takes the lion’s share of Korea’s ODA, ranking highest among the DAC countries. Neverthless, it is believed that Korea’s ODA policy particularly with respect to AfT faces major challenges in order to secure aid effectiveness. Major criticism includes that most of AfT programmes are designed from supplier's perspectives. Also, Korea’s AfT policy lacks adequate overall policy framework. In most major donor countries, AfT is either conducted as a specific sector or considered as a cross-cutting issue.

There are two major policy areas of AfT in establishing an efficient policy framework; basic principle and institutional framework. The former includes mainstreaming of trade, pro-poor Aft and strategy for aid effectiveness such as program based approach. The latter is about setting up institutional framework of AfT. As far as mainstreaming of trade is concerned, Korea has not shown any systematic efforts even though it emphasizes trade as an important area of aid policy. Also, Korea’s ODA policy puts less weights on the principle of pro-poor AfT. Considering these two principles are well regarded international norm of AfT, it is high time for Korea to introduce them into its AfT policy.

Preparation of institutional framework of AfT seems to be the requisite for establishing right AfT policy. This study recommends a hybrid model of AfT policy framework. The hybrid model simultaneously considers AfT as a specific sector and a cross-cutting issue. The rationale for this approach is to incorporate Korea’s current fragmented ODA policy structure, that is MOFAT(Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade) and MOSF(Ministry of Strategy and Finance) take responsibilities for non-concessional and concessional aid respectively. This study proposes that Korea needs to include trade in the list of specific sectors of non-concessional aid. At the same time, trade needs to be considered as a cross-cutting issue in many large concessional aid projects. Also, it is suggested that AfT strategic guideline needs to be formulated for the effectiveness of the hybrid model. In this context, this study encourages an active role of the office of the Prime Minister is important to coordinate the funtions of MOFAT and MOSF.

Issue Date

제1장 서론: 한국의 ODA 정책과 무역 분야 원조의 의의

제2장 무역 분야 원조의 세계적 추세 및 평가
1. 무역 분야 원조의 추세 및 특징
2. 주요 공여국 무역 분야 원조의 분야별 현황과 평가

제3장 한국의 무역 분야 원조의 특징 및 지원 현황
1. 국제 비교를 통해 본 한국의 무역 분야 원조의 특징
2. 한국의 무역 분야 원조의 세부 지원 현황

제4장 주요국의 무역 분야 원조 정책체계
1. 무역 분야 원조 정책체계의 중요성
2. 주요국의 정책체계
가. 독일
나. 영국
다. 일본
라. 미국
마. 스웨덴
3. 시사점
가. AfT의 정책방향 및 원칙
나. AfT 추진체제

제5장 한국의 무역 분야 원조 정책체계 구축방안
1. 한국의 무역 분야 원조의 문제점
2. 한국의 무역 분야 원조 정책체계의 현황 및 평가
가. 정책방향 및 원칙
나. 추진체제
3. 한국의 무역 분야 원조 정책체계에 대한 구상
가. 국제 규범과 일관된 정책방향 및 원칙의 채택
나. 복합형 AfT 추진체제 구축

제6장 결 론


부 록

Executive Summary
Series Title
대외경제정책연구원 ODA 기초 연구 11-03
Files in This Item:
    There are no files associated with this item.

Click the button and follow the links to connect to the full text. (KDI CL members only)


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

상단으로 이동