혁신주도형 경제로의 전환에 있어서 중소기업의 역할

창업보육센터의 운영실태와 개선과제

김주훈 / 이수일(Author)

  • 418 ITEM VIEW

10. Policy Agenda on Business Incubators | Joo-Hoon Kim.Suil Lee

This chapter consists mainly of three parts: 1) the performance evaluation of business incubators in Korea using the data from Business Incubator Network System; 2) the
behavior analysis of business incubators and tenant firms using survey data; and 3) the suggestion of several reform measures based on the performance evaluation and behavior analysis.

The first part of the chapter explains the distribution of business incubators in Korea by host institution, by business sector, and by region, and then evaluates the general
performance of the business incubators on the following criteria: 1) survival rate of graduate firms; 2) number of jobs created; and 3) increased sales of tenant firms. It also
analyzes the characteristics of the founders of tenant firms and the managers of the business incubators. In Korea, the survival rate of graduate firms is approximately 71% as compared to 5 or 6% of new firms in general. An average tenant firm has experienced an increase of the number of employees and sales by 0.5 person and
110 million won, respectively, after moving into a business incubator. The comparison of the business incubators by host institution shows that business incubators hosted by public research institutions are much more successful in achieving their goals than ones hosted by universities or local governments.While the founders of tenant firms have similar potential capabilities as the founders of venture firms, the data from Business Incubator Network System indicate that the business incubators have difficulties in hiring eligible incubator managers and strengthening the expertise of managers and staff members.

We performed a survey analysis for 1,009 tenant firms, of which the objective is to investigate the behavioral aspects of business incubators and tenant firms regarding the following three categories: 1) the types of services provided by the incubators and the degree of satisfaction of the tenant firms on those services; 2) the degree of internal and external networking of the tenant firms; and 3) the degree of innovativeness of the tenant firms. The second part of the chapter summarizes the results of the survey analysis. At first, the survey shows that the provision of services by the incubators does not meet the needs of the tenant firms in all types of services. In particular,
marketing assistance and financing assistance fall significantly behind the needs of the tenant firms. Regarding the internal and external networking of the tenant firms, we find that approximately 40% of the tenant firms in the sample cooperate with other tenant firms in the same incubator and about 61% of the tenant firms have business relationship with outside firms at close range. 55% of the total sample have also executed or are in the middle of carrying out joint researches with host universities or host
research institutions. On average, a tenant firm conducts interviews with professors and researchers for technical support and gives advice on 15 occasions, annually. These findings indicate that the tenant firms have well established all of three types of networking, that is, internal networking between tenant firms, external networking with outside firms, and industry-university-research institution cooperation. Finally, according to the survey, the tenant firms in Korea seem to be relatively innovative. Approximately 20% of the tenant firms in the sample answered that there would be no competitor in related markets for a while. Grouping the tenant firms by their founders and comparing the innovativeness of each group, the tenant firms founded by university professors and researchers seem to be the most innovative.

Based on the performance evaluation and behavior analysis of business incubators and tenant firms in the previous parts, we suggest several remedies for improving the
effectiveness of business incubation in the third part of the chapte

Issue Date
 제10장 창업보육센터의 운영실태와 개선과제
  제1절 문제의 제기
  제2절 창업보육정책의 중요성
  제3절 창업보육센터의 역사적?이론적 고찰
   1. 창업보육센터의 연원과 전개과정
   2. 창업보육센터의 보육효과에 관한 연구
  제4절 우리나라 창업보육센터의 운영 실태
  제5절 창업보육센터 운영에 관한 실증분석
   1. 설문의 구성 및 표본의 특성
   2. 설문결과의 분석
   3. 설문결과의 요약
  제6절 결론 및 정책적 시사점
Series Title
KDI 연구보고서 2005-05
Start Page
End Page
Files in This Item:
    There are no files associated with this item.

Click the button and follow the links to connect to the full text. (KDI CL members only)


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.