Contents

Why Standard Measures of Human Capital are Misleading

Eric A. Hanushek

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorEric A. Hanushek-
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-27T06:44:36Z-
dc.date.available2015-06-24-
dc.date.available2016-07-27T06:44:36Z-
dc.date.issued2015-06-24-
dc.identifier.other2630-
dc.identifier.urihttps://archives.kdischool.ac.kr/handle/11125/19359-
dc.description.abstractof measurement issues surrounding the concept of human capital. The traditional approach of rely entirely on measures of school attainment, while convenient, is almost certainly misleading. The availability of cognitive skills measures greatly improves on-
dc.description.tableOfContentsI. Introduction  II. A Short History  III. Distortions in Estimating the Returns to Skills  IV. Alternative Estimates of the Returns to Individual Human Capital  V. International Estimates of Returns to Skills  VI. Alternative Interpretations-
dc.languageen-
dc.publisher한국개발연구원-
dc.publisherKorea Development Institute-
dc.relation.isPartOf14185-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.titleWhy Standard Measures of Human Capital are Misleading-
dc.title.alternativeWhy Standard Measures of Human Capital are Misleading-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.relation.startpage22-
dc.relation.lastpage37-
dc.relation.volume37-
dc.relation.no2-
Files in This Item:

Click the button and follow the links to connect to the full text. (KDI CL members only)

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

상단으로 이동